Search

Find insights, training programs, and workshops

Build / Buy / Partner / Participate — Ecosystem Strategy
Intermediate to Advanced (SA, EA, TS)5-6 hoursBuild/buy/partner/participate decision framework + vendor and ecosystem evaluation scorecard + exit and switching cost analysis template

How to decide what to build, what to buy, what to access through partners, and what to participate in through ecosystems — covering differentiation vs commodity analysis, vendor evaluation, total cost of ownership, interoperability velocity, exit strategy, and lock-in risk.

...Differentiation vs commodity — The first question every sourcing decision must answer Most sourcing decisions start with "should we build or buy?" — but that's the wrong first question. The right first...

1 DayIntensive
StrategicSA · EA · TS
Platform Thinking
Intermediate to Advanced (SA, EA, TS)5-6 hoursPlatform strategy canvas + internal platform design guide + shared capability register

How to shift from building one-off solutions to building reusable internal platforms — shared foundations that allow teams to deliver independently without solving the same problems repeatedly.

...to deploy a new service: 1. Clone the template repository. 2. Run . 3. Write your code. 4. Run . No decisions needed. No configuration to figure out. It just works." Teams can deviate from the golden path...

1 DayIntensive
CurrentSA · EA · TS
AI Decision Rights: Who Decides What When No Human Is Watching?
AI Decision Rights: Who Decides What When No Human Is Watching?

Decision rights models assume human decision-makers. AI agents breach that assumption silently. Here is how to extend decision rights to cover autonomous actors before the first ungoverned decision becomes a production incident.

Executive Summary Who this is for: CTOs, Enterprise Architects, AI Governance Leads, Architecture Board Members, Heads of Engineering Problem it solves: Decision rights models exist in most...

Batch vs Real-Time Is the Wrong Debate.
Batch vs Real-Time Is the Wrong Debate.

Organisations debate batch versus real-time as if it is a technical preference. It is not. It is a structural mismatch between data freshness and decision cadence — and the mismatch is where the cost lives.

...model called Decision-Data Latency Alignment (DDLA) that matches data freshness to the cadence of the decisions it serves Time to implement: 30–60 days Business impact: Reduced infrastructure waste, eliminated...

Your On-Call Log Is Your Real Org Chart.
Your On-Call Log Is Your Real Org Chart.

Why on-call rotation data is the most accurate org chart your engineering organisation has — and almost nobody uses it to make structural decisions.

...model that uses incident and on-call data to reveal real ownership distribution and drive org design decisions grounded in operational truth Time to implement: 30–60 days to build an Incident Ownership...

Run Event Storming Twice. The First Maps the System. The Second Exposes Governance.
Run Event Storming Twice. The First Maps the System. The Second Exposes Governance.

Why the second run of an Event Storming workshop — the one most teams never attempt — is the fastest way to surface governance gaps that architecture diagrams will never show.

Executive Summary Who this is for: Enterprise Architects, Solution Architects, Architecture Leads, Domain-Driven Design practitioners Problem it solves: Governance gaps — missing owners,...

AI Decision-Making & Human Oversight
Beginner to Intermediate3-4 hoursHuman oversight framework + decision rights map + review checklist

AI can assist decisions, but accountability still belongs to people. Learn the operating rules for review, approval, escalation, confidence, and human authority in AI-supported work.

...oversight Decision support vs decision delegation Confidence, escalation, and review When not to automate decisions Designing accountable workflows Building an approval architecture The oversight model in one...

Half DayPractical
Control ModelDecision Ready
Team Topologies & Organisational Design Workshop
CTO, VP Engineering, Engineering Directors, Principal EngineersTeam topology map, interaction model, platform team charter, cognitive load assessment

Your architecture isn't just a technical choice. It's a consequence of how your teams are structured. Fix the structure, and the architecture follows.

...system that looks like your organisation. That's not a metaphor — it's a law. If you want a different architecture, you need a different team structure first. That one idea changes everything. It turns delivery...

1 DayIntensive
Team BlueprintClear Boundaries
Your HCI Proof of Concept Measures the Wrong Thing.
Your HCI Proof of Concept Measures the Wrong Thing.

Most organizations evaluate private cloud and HCI platforms by running a technical POC. The POC passes. The platform fails. The reason is structural — and fixable. The Platform Fitness Evaluation Model (PFEM) tells you what to measure instead.

...platform succeeds Time to implement: 30–60 days before any platform commitment Business impact: Platform decisions that survive year two — not just the boardroom The Surgeon and the Operating Theatre Imagine...

Requirement Clarity: How Structured Persona Definition Reduces Rework and Misalignment
Requirement Clarity: How Structured Persona Definition Reduces Rework and Misalignment

A structured framework for defining personas that eliminates scope creep, reduces rework, and aligns engineering delivery with actual user needs — before development begins.

...adoption is low. Stakeholders question priorities. Scope shifts mid-sprint. Requirements get rewritten. Architecture decisions are challenged weeks after approval. This is not a capability problem. It is a...

1···6789