Skip to content

Primary practice

Enterprise Architecture

Make the decisions stick.

Architecture is the set of decisions your organisation has already made, whether or not anyone wrote them down. The work is making those decisions visible, deciding them at the right altitude, and keeping them from being relitigated every quarter.

The problem

Architecture friction rarely shows up as a bad decision. It shows up as a decision nobody can find, made by someone who was not supposed to make it, revisited for the third time this year.

Escalation by default

Choices that a team could own arrive at a governance forum, and choices the forum should own get made quietly in a pull request.

No decision record

The rationale lives in the heads of two people. When they are unavailable, or leave, the debate restarts from zero.

Review as a queue

Architecture review is scheduled rather than conversational, so it becomes a gate teams route around instead of a service they use.

The cost is not the wrong architecture. It is the calendar — weeks of senior time spent re-deciding, and delivery waiting on a slot.

The model behind it

Technology Decision Domain ArchitectureTDDA

Most architecture friction is not caused by bad decisions. It is caused by decisions happening at the wrong altitude — enterprise-level calls made by individual teams, or team-level decisions escalated to committees with no business being involved.

Altitude
Enterprise / Domain / Team / Individual
Domain
Investment / Standards / Platform / Integration / Implementation / Security

The matrix makes authority visible, prevents unnecessary escalation, and ensures the decisions that need scrutiny actually get it. It is the fastest intervention where “who decides this?” is a recurring, expensive question.

Read the full TDDA framework →

Try this week, without booking anything

  • List your top five recurring technology decisions. For each: who makes it now, and who should?
  • Find one decision consistently happening at the wrong altitude — too high or too low.

The programme

The Architecture Programme

A decision system your organisation can run without you: who decides what, at which altitude, recorded in a form that survives a handover.

Who it is for
Enterprise, solution and domain architects; principal engineers; the VP or CTO who owns the review forum.
How it runs
Modules run half-day to two days. Take a single track, or sequence the core arc over a quarter.
Catalogue
32 modules across 7 tracks, plus 4 facilitated sessions

Not sure where to start? The core arc is Foundations → Governance & Control → Strategy & Direction. Everything else stays available — take a single module or sequence a track.

Facilitated sessions

Worked on your material, not a case study

Facilitated sessions run with your own architecture and your own people, and produce an artefact you keep.

Working under regulation

Regimes this material covers

Named in the modules below, as design constraints rather than checklists — where the control belongs in the architecture, and what evidence an auditor can actually read. This is what the curriculum addresses; it is not a certification, an audit opinion, or legal advice.

The thinking behind it

Read before you book

How it went somewhere else

Reducing Architecture Decision Time by 60%

How a SaaS scale-up introduced ADRs and a decision rights matrix to cut architecture review cycles from weeks to days.

Client
Series A SaaS Scale-Up (80 employees)
Industry
Enterprise SaaS
Duration
6 weeks
Read the full case study →

Free 30-minute diagnostic

Which decisions are stuck?

Bring three decisions your organisation has revisited more than once. Thirty minutes is usually enough to see where the authority sits and where it should.

Not the right one?