Skip to content

Search

Find insights, training programs, and workshops

Platform Engineering & DevEx Strategy Workshop
VP Engineering, Platform Leads, Engineering ManagersPlatform engineering strategy, golden path specifications, DevEx baseline

Design internal developer platforms and golden paths that accelerate delivery, improve developer experience, and create standardised pathways.

...of this workshop is concrete: design internal developer platforms and golden paths that accelerate delivery, improve developer experience (DevEx), and create standardised, secure, observable pathways. I've...

2 DaysStrategic Design
DevEx ImprovementTeam Velocity
Fractional Technology Leadership Engagement
Startups and scale-ups needing senior technology leadershipTechnology strategy, architecture governance, team development, board reporting

Embed experienced technology leadership into your organisation on a part-time basis—owning architecture decisions, team development, and delivery governance.

...leadership into your organisation on a part-time basis — owning architecture decisions, team development, delivery governance, and executive reporting without the overhead of a full-time hire. I've seen startups...

1-3 Days/WeekEmbedded
Fraction of CostFull-time Hire
Paying Down Debt Through Feature Work
CTOs, Engineering Leaders, Enterprise Architects, Product Leaders3-4 hoursA feature-driven debt reduction policy — the rule, the visibility mechanism, and the two questions review asks about every feature

Debt accumulates faster than refactoring projects can remove it. Fund architecture improvement through the product roadmap instead of competing with it.

Quick Navigation Start here — the technical debt trap The wrong model: debt separated from delivery The feature refactoring principle Practice 1 — Refactor the area you touch Practice 2 — Expand...

1 DayIntensive
ContinuousNot a project
Analyzing Business Strategies: From Strategic Intent to Execution Discipline
Analyzing Business Strategies: From Strategic Intent to Execution Discipline

A structured executive guide to analyzing business strategies using a four-layer framework that connects intent, positioning, capability, and execution discipline.

...Platform ecosystem vs product excellence If a company claims: High quality Lowest price Fastest delivery Most innovative Simultaneously… It likely has no positioning discipline. Strategic Insight If...

Your Platform Team Is Building a Product Nobody Asked For.
Your Platform Team Is Building a Product Nobody Asked For.

Most platform teams build internal products their engineering teams never chose. Platform adoption is not a marketing problem. It is a product governance problem. Here is the model that fixes it.

...structured model called the Platform Product Governance Model (PPGM) — three layers that turn platform delivery from a build-and-hope approach into a governed product lifecycle Time to implement: 45–90 days Business...

Monitoring Added After Deployment Is Not Observability. It Is Archaeology.
Monitoring Added After Deployment Is Not Observability. It Is Archaeology.

Observability is not a monitoring add-on. It is an architectural constraint. Systems built without observability baked in cannot be understood, cannot be governed, and cannot be improved. The OSAF model tells you exactly where your architecture is blind.

...sequence looks like this: Architect the system Build the system Deploy the system Add logging Add metrics Add tracing Wonder why nothing connects This is not observability. This is archaeology. You...

You Cannot Improve an Architecture You Have Not Measured.
You Cannot Improve an Architecture You Have Not Measured.

Enterprise architecture maturity is not a feeling. It is a score. Organizations that cannot measure their architecture maturity cannot improve it. The EAMS model gives you the score.

...tells you nothing about 2026. Architecture maturity is not static. It drifts. It degrades under delivery pressure. It needs to be scored regularly. Enterprise Architecture Maturity Score (EAMS) Enterprise...

Your HCI Proof of Concept Measures the Wrong Thing.
Your HCI Proof of Concept Measures the Wrong Thing.

Most organizations evaluate private cloud and HCI platforms by running a technical POC. The POC passes. The platform fails. The reason is structural — and fixable. The Platform Fitness Evaluation Model (PFEM) tells you what to measure instead.

...organizations say: The platform works. But operations are harder than expected. Upgrade cycles are disrupting delivery windows. The support model does not match how our teams escalate incidents. The licensing...

Operating Model Choices
Advanced (EA, TS)5-6 hoursOperating model design canvas + team topology guide + Conway's Law application worksheet + Communication Structure Heatmap

How the structure of technology teams shapes the structure of the systems they build — covering Conway's Law, centralised vs federated models, platform teams, product operating models, team topologies, and designing the organisation that produces the architecture you want.

...domain teams — autonomy within guardrails. Implementation owned by stream teams — full ownership of delivery. Transitioning from centralised to federated: Centralised — everything through one body. Delegate...

1 DayIntensive
StrategicEA · TS
Platform as a Product
CTOs, Heads of Platform Engineering, VP Engineering, Enterprise Architects, Platform Product Managers3-4 hoursA three-gate platform governance plan — validated backlog, a written scope boundary, and adoption targets per capability

An internal platform with no product owner builds what nobody asked for and skips what everybody needs — adoption, not completeness, is the only measure that counts.

...delivered, uptime at 99.9%, a hundred tickets resolved, three integrations completed. Every one of those metrics describes what the platform team produced; none describe whether anyone used it. Meanwhile one...

1 DayIntensive
AdoptionNot feature count